We can't use rating yet (hopefully soon), so at the moment it is just the priority user chooses. From 1-low to 9-high is very subjective and people tend to rate things higher, than they 'objectively' are. I just stumbled across this classification from Bram Molenaar and think that it is a good guideline for rating Items. As long as we use the Priority field, it would be easy to implement, later for Ratings we would have to add something like a legend or so..
- copied from VIM reference manual TODO List -
Priority classification:
9 next point release
8 next release
7 as soon as possible
6 soon
5 should be included
4 nice to have
3 consider including
2 maybe not
1 probably not
- unclassified
- end of copy -
For the moment, just write it behind the numbers in the priority field. When rating is implemented, we have to think again about this.
This one was pending open for too long - CLOSED!
Conceptual redesign of dev.tw.o needed anyways!!
To help developers solve the bug, we kindly request that you demonstrate your bug on a show2.tiki.org instance. To start, simply select a version and click on "Create show2.tiki.org instance". Once the instance is ready (in a minute or two), as indicated in the status window below, you can then access that instance, login (the initial admin username/password is "admin") and configure the Tiki to demonstrate your bug. Priority will be given to bugs that have been demonstrated on show2.tiki.org.
filename | created | hits | comment | version | filetype | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No attachments for this item |