Category: 12.x Regression

If I add a rating to a new tracker, the rating is not saved.

Also the rating value star has an opaque white background.

These occur on dev.tiki.org presently.

~~#F00:Update:~~ Still not working on dev.tiki.org revision 48335. {sign user="Bsfez" datetime="2013-11-05T07:14:49+00:00"}

The rating gets saved now but is not displaying. {sign user="pascalstjean" datetime="2013-11-24T00:42:50+00:00"}

~~#F00:Update : ~~ I retested on the 28/11/13. {sign user="Bsfez" datetime="2013-11-28T13:22:50+00:00"}
Not logged i saw that they were 3 votes but could see star on or off;
{img fileId="645" thumb="y" rel="box[g]"}

Once logged i voted and the score was reseted to 0;
{img fileId="646" thumb="y" rel="box[g]"}
---
This worked well in Tiki9., and it's still borken as of r49090 (December 15th). {sign user="xavi" datetime="2013-12-15T10:27:49+00:00"}
If Rating with "Stars (system)" is supposed to be deprecated, could someone please help to switch the rating system in the dev.t.o Bug Tracker ([tracker5]) so that it can use whatever new rating system is not "deprecated"?
This way, since the new [http://doc.tiki.org/Rating%20Tracker%20Field|Rating field is not documented] as of Dec 14th 2013, we could see it here at least as a working example.{sign user="xavi" datetime="2013-12-15T10:39:46+00:00"}
---
Ok, added the new Rating system myself to the Bug Tracker (new field 152: "New Rating"). And it works out of the box. Good job whoever coded the new feature. {sign user="xavi" datetime="2013-12-15T10:45:10+00:00"}

__unified_incremental_update doesn't check for feature_search__

Unified Search with Lucene is awesome and is "the future of Tiki".

Now, on certain server configurations, it doesn't work well. An easy workaround is to simply revert to the legacy MySQL Full Text Search.

However, even when using MySQL Full Text Search, unified_incremental_update is defaulted to yes, and tried to update Lucene index, and generates an error message

Workaround is to deactivate unified_incremental_update, or even better, upgrade to 12.x and use Unified Index, with MySQL as storage.
---
Update: this issue has been reproduced in 12.x svn (and untested in 14.x so far, afaik) also with Mysql Full Text Search as unified search engine (on a multitiki install). See: [item5673] . {sign user="xavi" datetime="2015-05-19T09:10:57+00:00"}

Sort on rating at this tracker is broken.
To reproduce:
* Login here: http://dev.tiki.org/tracker5 (as user xavi, plain registered user)
* click on rating column (to sort items on their rating): it apparently works, even if it shows first the ones with the lowest rating.
* click again on rating column (attemping to sort the items with highest rating first), and still items with 0 in the rating are showed first.

url (only with open items, to reduce potential factors interfering): http://dev.tiki.org/tiki-view_tracker.php?trackerId=5&sort_mode=f_152_desc&status=o

^ __Note__:
Please note that this is using the maintained (non deprecated) rating tracker field (field 152, type "Rating"). If you are an admin, you will see still 2 fields as rating, but one, the former and unmantained (field 62, "Old Rating - Stars (system) visible by Admins only"), is hidden from registered users (it's kept there in dev.t.o in case some devs makes an script to convert the data from the old tracker field into the values for the new tracker field in all tracker items of the same tracker).

I tag this wish a regression since I remember that this worked in past, years ago, but unfortuntely I can't say in which specific version.

I consider this isse to be somewhat important since tiki are being used more and more to allow communities to gather user feedback to prioritize issues, actions, strategies, proposals, etc., in a genuine "wisdowm of crowds" way, and this issue prevents using tiki for this goal, which is a pity when you are using Tiki in the same community for many other community needs... See http://doc.tiki.org/E-democracy
^

---
Maybe related to [item1446|item 1146: Trackers: Need to be able sort as numerical instead of text]?